P Percy Bysshe Shelley

Ozymandias by Percy Bysshe Shelley

‘Ozymandias’ is about the nature of power. It is an important piece that features how a great ruler like Ozymandias and his legacy was buried in the pages of history.

Here is an analysis of ‘Ozymandias’, a poem written by one of the greatest Romantic poets in history, Percy Bysshe Shelley. Shelley never achieved fame while he was alive, but he did keep company with some extremely talented writers: his good friends included George Gordon Lord Byron and John Keats, and he was married to Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein. Shelley’s most popular works include ‘Ozymandias’, ‘To a Skylark‘, and ‘Prometheus Unbound’, which is perhaps his most lauded work. Born into a well-to-do family, Shelley eventually attended Oxford, where he first started his writing career. He was expelled, however, when he refused to admit that he was the author of an anonymous text on atheism. Shelley met and fell in love with a young Mary Godwin, even though he was already married. He abandoned his family to be with her; they married after his first wife committed suicide, and Mary changed her surname to Shelley. Tragically, Shelley died young, at the age of 29, when the boat he was sailing got caught in a storm. His body washed to shore sometime later.

Ozymandias by Percy Bysshe Shelley


In this poem, the speaker describes meeting a traveler “from an antique land.” The title, ‘Ozymandias’, notifies the reader that this land is most probably Egypt, since Ozymandias was what the Greeks called Ramses II, a great and terrible pharaoh in ancient Egypt. The traveler tells a story to the speaker. In the story, he describes visiting Egypt and seeing a large and intimidating statue in the sand. He can tell that the sculptor must have known his subject well because it is obvious from the statues face that this man was a great leader, but one who could also be very vicious: he describes his sneer as having a “cold command.” Even though the leader was probably very great, it seems that the only thing that survives from his realm is this statue, which is half buried and somewhat falling apart.

Analysis of Ozymandias

Ozymandias’ is considered to be a Petrarchan sonnet, even though the rhyme scheme varies slightly from the traditional form. As all sonnets are, this poem contains fourteen lines and is written in iambic pentameter. The rhyme scheme of Ozymandias’ is ababacdcedefef. This rhyme scheme differs from the rhyme scheme of a traditional Petrarchan sonnet, whose octave (the first eight lines of the poem) usually has a rhyme scheme of abbaabba; its sestet (the final six lines of the sonnet) does not have an assigned rhyme scheme, but it usually rhymes every other line, or contains three different rhymes. Shelley’s defiance of this rhyme scheme helps to set apart Ozymandias’ from other Petrarchan sonnets, and it is perhaps why this poem is so memorable. The reason he did this may have been to represent the corruption of authority.

To start, Ozymandias carries an extended metaphor throughout the entire poem. All around the traveler is desert—nothing is green or growing; the land is barren. The statue, however, still boasts of the accomplishments this civilization had in the past. The desert represents the fall of all empires—nothing powerful and rich can ever stay that strong forever. This metaphor is made even more commanding in the poem by Shelley’s use of an actual ruler—Shelley utilizes an allusion to a powerful ruler in ancient Egypt to show that even someone so all-powerful will eventually fall.

The sonnet itself reads more like a story than a poem, although the line rhymes do help to remind the reader that this is not prose. The speaker in the poem, perhaps Percy Bysshe Shelley, tells the story from his point of view, using the pronoun “I.” The first line reads, “I met a traveler from an antique land…” At first, this line is a tad ambiguous: Is the traveler from an antique land, or did he just come back from visiting one? The reader also does not know where the speaker first met this sojourner. The title indicates which land the traveler has visited: The Greeks called Ramses II, a powerful Egyptian pharaoh, Ozymandias, so it is easy for the reader to recognize the antique land as Egypt, one of the oldest civilizations in the world. The lines that follow are much clearer than the first, however, and it is clear to the reader what, exactly, is occurring in the sonnet. The rest of the sonnet is actually written in dialogue; the traveler is recounting his experiences in Egypt to the poem’s speaker. Lines two through fourteen are only one sentence in length, as well. These lines also contain some of the most vivid and beautiful imagery in all of poetry. Shelley was such a masterful writer that it does not take much effort on the part of the reader to clearly imagine the scene in this poem. In lines two through five, the traveler describes a statue he sees in Egypt. Shelley writes:

Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert…Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command…

In these lines, the reader, through the eyes of the traveler, sees two massive legs carved from stone lying in the desert sand. Nearby, the face of the statue is half-buried. The face is broken, but the traveler can still see the sculpture is wearing a frown and a sneer. From this, he is able to tell that this ruler probably had absolutely power, and he most definitely ruled with an iron fist. It is also easy to interpret that this ruler probably had a lot of pride as the supreme leader of his civilization.

The traveler then turns his attention to the sculptor who made the statue, commenting that whomever the sculptor is, he knew his subject very well. Shelley writes, “Tell that its sculptor well those passions read/Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things…” Shelley also seems to be commenting in line seven that while there is an end to natural life, art is eternal—it survives.

Lines eight through eleven give more details about the sculpture, and the latter ones include words that have been etched into the ruler’s pedestal. Shelley writes,

The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal, these words appear:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

The traveler provides interesting insight into the leader here. First, his hands show that the pharaoh mocked his people, yet his heart was not all bad: he fed and cared for his people, as well. This line provides an interesting dichotomy often found in the most terrible of leaders. The words written on the pedestal on which the leader sits also tells of Ozymandias’ personality. He is ordering those who see him to look upon all that he has created, but do not appreciate what he has done. Instead, despair and be afraid of it. These words perfectly depict the leader’s hubris.

The last three lines, however, take on a different tone. Now, the leader is gone, and so is his empire. Shelley implements irony into these lines to show that even though this broken statue remains, the leader’s civilization does not. It has fallen, much like the statue, and has turned to dust. Shelley writes,

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.

These are powerful lines, and the traveler almost seems to be mocking the ruler. Shelley’s diction here is important. He uses words such as decay and bare to show just how powerless this once-mighty pharaoh has become. There is absolutely nothing left. The leader, much like his land, and much like the broken statue depicting him, has fallen. It is in these lines that the theme of the poem emerges: All leaders will eventually pass, and all civilizations will eventually fall.

Historical Context

It is an understatement to say that Shelley was a clever man. While one can read this poem to be about an ancient leader of Egypt, the poem could also be read as a criticism for the world in which Shelley lived. Ever the political critic, Shelley is perhaps warning the leaders of England that they, too, will fall someday.


Who is Ozymandias?

Ramesses II or Ramesses the Great, is known as Ozymandias in Greek historical sources. He was the third pharaoh of the 19th Dynasty of Egypt and is often regarded as the mightiest, most celebrated, and greatest pharaoh of Ancient Egypt.

When was ‘Ozymandias’ published?

The English Romantic poet Percy Bysshe Shelley wrote the sonnet, ‘Ozymandias’, with it being first published in The Examiner on 11 January 1818.

What does Ozymandias mean?

‘Ozymandias,’ the title of Shelley’s one of the best-known sonnets refers to the Ancient Egyptian pharaoh, Ramesses II. Through this poem, Shelley throws light on the nature of power and impermanence of regnal glory, by referring to a fragment of a statue of Ramesses II or Ozymandias.

What is the theme of ‘Ozymandias’?

The central theme of the poem is the transience of glory, as well as power. It also taps on the themes of the futility of life, the fate of history, ravages of time, antiquity, and impermanence. The main theme is introduced in the very beginning where Shelley’s speaker describes the “colossal Wreck” of Ozymandias half sunk in the lone desert.

What is Ozymandias?

Ozymandias is the Greek name of a pharaoh from Ancient Egypt. He is Ramesses II or Ramesses the Great. The name Ozymandias comes from the first part of the regnal name of Ramesses, “Usermaatre Setepenre”. Shelley’s sonnet refers to a half-destroyed statue of this pharaoh.

What is the poem about?

‘Ozymandias’ is about the nature of power. Shelley describes how powerful men and their legacies are destined to fade into oblivion. It is an important piece that features how a great ruler like Ozymandias and his legacy was buried in the pages of history.

What is the message of the poem?

Through ‘Ozymandias,’ Shelley tries to give an important message. He wants to say no matter how much rulers try, their deeds are going to be forgotten after death. In this way, the poet warns readers not to be infatuated with power. Power does not guarantee eternal glory, only meekness does.

Why was ‘Ozymandias’ written?

In 1817, the British Museum announced that they had acquired a statue of Ramesses II, an Ancient Egyptian ruler. Shelley was inspired by the fact and started writing this poem in the same year. In the Christmas of 1817, Horace Smith and Shelley chose a passage from the writing of the Greek historian Diodorus Siculus. The passage described a similar statue and quoted the inscription: “King of Kings Ozymandias am I.” Shelley wrote this poem inspired by this description of the statue of Ozymandias from Diodorus.

What is the irony in ‘Ozymandias’?

The irony of this sonnet lies in the last few lines. After reading the lines, “My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;/ Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!” readers can understand the nature of the speaker. He is a haughty ruler who, under the impression of being the most powerful, dares to challenge the Almighty. What has happened to him? The next lines ironically express it better. According to Shelley’s speaker, “Nothing beside remains.” With just three ironic words, Shelley destroys his self-conceit.

What is the metaphor in ‘Ozymandias’?

The poem begins with a metaphor. Shelley uses the metaphor of a “traveller” for pointing at the Greek historian Diodorus. Besides, the title is a metaphor. It refers to a fragment of Ozymandias’s statue. Furthermore, a metaphor, “colossal Wreck” is used as a reference to Ozymandias.

Discover the Essential Secrets

of Poetry

Sign up to unveil the best kept secrets in poetry,

brought to you by the experts

Jamie joined the Poem Analysis team back in November, 2010. He has a passion for poetry and enjoys analysing and providing interpretations for poetry from the past and present.
  • Mystery student says:

    Bonjour again monsieur! It’s the French mystery student. I have an unconventional request but it’s life so I’ll get on with it. Microsoft teams has stopped working for me, and I therefore am unable to contact my teachers (I was apparently in contact with a covid case so I’m in lock down) so I do not know what work I am wanted to do. So I decided to do a trial exam on the similarities between ‘Ozymandias’ and ‘Extract from the prelude’ as I think it was going to be an exam. So my question is will you rate my work so far? I have only done the introduction and 1st paragraph due to I not having all of my notes. So here it is:

    Both poets present the idea that nature is everlasting and more powerful than man in ‘Ozymandias’ and’Extract from the Prelude’. Together, Shelly and Wordsworth consider the momentary power of humans and it’s susceptibility to nature. this forces the reader to understand their insignificance and question their own feeble existance.

    Both Shelly and Wordsworth present man’s arrogance and seemingly obsessive desire of power and control. Firstly Shelly uses a Shakespearean sonnet, however it does not completely follow the form and mixes slightly with a Petrarchan sonnet. his defiance in following the form symbolises his opposition to the rule of English leaders in his time. Furthermore , Shelly appears to have broken the Shakespearean sonnet -which is usually portrayed to convey love for another- to express that people in power tend to have a self obsession and re-enforce the idea that Ozymandias’s love was not directed towards the people he ruled over but himself and more power. this led me to connect that Shelly saw this mirrored in his country’s leaders and uses a mocking tone towards mankind’s strive for power which disappears in due time has proven in the repetitive history. Similarly ‘The Prelude Extract’ follows unrhymed lines of iambic pentameter which would make it Shakespearean, however like Shelley, he also veers away from this as he disregards the stanza form. Wordsworth brings a conversational tone to the monotony of the verse, thus allowing the reader to discuss / examine the philosophical significance in relation to society at large. There is a blatant repetition in his descriptions of his experiences which may have been used to imply the repetition of history, seeming to patronize that arrogance of leaders; using blatancy and conversational tones possibly to imitate his current ,believed egotistical, leaders. The relaxed and carefree demeanor Wordsworth portrays, juxtaposes the believed ‘radical’ and ‘unconventional’ ideas of diction he would put forth.

    I would then go on to use quotes and into the other statements. But I am quite the slow writer and would most likely only get to the second paragraph.

    • Lee-James Bovey says:

      That’s a great start! When you move on look at some of the other techniques being used and what they are used for, but you definitely have the hang of it. Good job.

  • Mystery student says:

    Hi I am a student and this is one of the poem in the GCSEs so I find this helpful, and im going to add my own analysis that I hope you can give me your opinion on.

    I believed that it was written in a Shakespearean sonnet however It didn’t seem to 100% follow the form. I believed that this was Shelly’s way of showing that he didn’t want to follow the rule of the English leaders symbolising his way of opposition to the. Including this I believe that wanted to reflect the similarities between leaders in his time to in the past; showing that history is repeating itself each in different contexts. Furthermore, my understanding is that Percy broke the Shakespearean sonnet -which is usually is portrayed to convey love for another- form to show that the people in power tend to have a self obsession and that Ozymandias’s love was not directed at the people he ruled over or their interests but to himself and for more power. This lead me to link that Shelly saw this self obsession and strive for more power mirrored in his countries leaders, and that he mocks their strive for power which will disappear in due time. He think their actions will receive hubris- a punishment from the gods for ones arrogance; this may not be conicidentally done as he it was a Greek ruler that was written about, something commonly associated with gods – and hopes to be like the traveller and see the remains of them after their downfall.

    That seem really long-winded, I hope you take time to read it and give some insight on my thoughts.

    • Lee-James Bovey says:

      This is terrific. I love how you have picked up on Shelley’s subversion of the form and given a reason for this. My only criticism is that I don’t think you can receive “hubris” my understanding is that it is a sense of over inflates pride or ego, so it is used slightly out of context here. Otherwise, you are golden. Good job.

  • Thanks for the analysis, it really helped me.

    • Lee-James Bovey says:

      Glad we could help.

  • Sienna J. says:

    Thank you for writing this! I had to research this poem for an English class, and it was very helpful!

  • DONNAcheese says:

    Excellent analysis, this helped me a lot!

    • Lee-James Bovey says:

      Thank you. Glad we were able to help.

  • >
    Share via
    Copy link
    Powered by Social Snap