Days by Philip Larkin

Here’s another offering from Philip Larkin, and one of my favorites I must confess. It is one of his least verbose and beguilingly simple at first, but strip it back and you’ll soon see some of Larkin’s trademark themes, life, death, the universe; it’s all in there. It is a short and enigmatic poem, there is no story and no characters, simply a brief contemplation on the meaning of life.  The title of the poem is quite simple Days, so you might think oh happy days! (sorry, couldn’t help myself) this one seems easy enough to understand. But no, of course this deals with greater themes. The tone is conversational and the language is accessible which is again typical of Larkin, who wanted to take poetry from the ‘litterati’ and give it back to the masses.

Days was published in The Whitsun Weddings, published by Faber and Faber in 1967, and preceded by his collection The Less Deceived. Larkin is known as one of Britain’s most famous post-war poets, and many of his poems in both these anthologies deal with themes of existential angst and the futility of life. You can read the whole poem here.


Structure and Form

Nothing too complicated, Days is a ten-line poem in two stanzas of six and four lines respectively. It’s almost a mini-sonnet, especially given the volta which occurs at line seven. (There’s no such thing as a mini-sonnet; that’s just some of my typical whimsy. Please ignore and don’t go writing that in an exam paper.) There’s no rhyme scheme to speak of except perhaps if you consider the internal rhyme of the frequently repeated key words such as ‘days’, ‘they’ and ‘time’.


Rhythm, what rhythm?

Yes, it’s tricky to put your finger on the rhythm here. We are familiar with the traditional iambic rhythm, you know ti-tum ti-tum ti-tum, with the emphasis on the second syllable, but I think this is more trochaic, which goes tum-ti tum-ti tum-ti thereby emphasising the first word/syllable. Read it aloud and I’m sure you’ll agree that you stress the first word in each sentence. I feel that this is a poem to be read slowly, enunciating each word, especially since the first stanza is like a parent talking to a child.


Days Analysis

First Stanza

The first stanza is composed of short sentences and opens with a question which is answered simplistically, as I said before, as though a parent trying to explore the concept of life to a small child. There is a sense of innocence in both the question and response, with the monosyllabic words chiming gently as though in a nursery rhyme or fable. Repetition is put to good use to make the reply simple and easy to digest, but also implicit is the meaning that days form our existence and thus are by definition repetitive. There is something warm and comforting about the explanation in lines two to six. Unusually for Larkin he states in line five: ‘They are to be happy in’, and we feel a flood of warmth for the speaker as we are unfamiliar with this side of him.  There is a cyclical aspect to this stanza as it begins and ends with a question, which goes on to be addressed (but definitely not answered) in the next verse.


Second Stanza

The tone changes in the second stanza. The comma after ‘Ah,’ elongates the sound and suggests the speaker uttering a world-weary sigh. He chooses the transitive verb ‘solving’ to show that the experts (the priest and the doctor) are searching for an answer that they have yet to find. The calm and soothing feel of the first stanza is lost and replaced by more urgent tone, for it brings them ‘running over the fields.’ Normally the pastoral image of fields would be peaceful but this is subverted here to show the tranquillity shattered by the men’s haste, as though they are tending to an emergency. This sense is emphasised by the image of the ‘long coats’, an image which could be frightening for a child. We associate the long coats with those in professional employ; but also implicit here is the symbol of ‘men in white coats’ which suggest that if one were to ponder too long on the mysteries of life we could end up in the loony bin. The fact that Larkin chooses the ‘priest and the doctor’ to try and solve the mystery is significant as they signify the age old conflict between science and religion. After the short concise sentences of stanza one this is one long unpunctuated sentence, aside from the comma after the ‘Ah’ and the full stop at the end.


About Philip Larkin

Philip Larkin, 1922-1985 was born in Coventry where he spent most of his life other than a sojourn in Belfast where he worked as a librarian in Queen’s University between 1950 and 1955. The good people of Belfast are most proud that he stayed so long, however Larkin himself didn’t seem overly thrilled with them. In a letter to his long term on/off girlfriend Monica Jones he wrote: “The place went to the dogs long ago and now the dogs are coming to it.” The old charmer. You can read more of his observations on the Irish here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

What's your thoughts? Join the conversation by commenting
We make sure to reply to every comment submitted, so feel free to join the community and let us know by commenting below.

Get more Poetry Analysis like this in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get new poetry analysis updates straight to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

  • Avatar Jay Bee says:

    ‘Days’ is a short poem dealing with suicide, a meaning that escapes many of the readers and forces to re-read the simple first stanza, just like you go searching for meaning from the last messages of someone you know who has killed himself. And conclude, “Yeah, the signs were there but how was I supposed to know from that?”
    “Days” acquires an ominous meaning, along with their repetitiveness (“time and time over”), as well as the words “wake” and “live” (“So he did not want to live anymore?” you ask yourself after reading the last line with the stress on “live”), while the line about happiness, stressing the word “are” acquires the meaning “the days are supposed to be happy but they certainly are not for me”.
    As you go to the second stanza, you understand the word “solving” – so it´s not the doctor and the priest trying to solve the question with their jobs but the writer of the poem has “solved” the question of “living in days” for himself by suicide. You understand that the doctor and the priest are not personifications of science and religion but they are wearing “long coats”, their work clothes, as they hurry “across the fields” to the lonely place in nature that the author has chosen for his “solution”, in order to tend to the body (last rites, pronouncement of death).

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Thank you for this! Very insightful.

  • Avatar Paul McAndrew says:

    Thanks for your succinct comment…..I enjoyed it as it coincided with my own response.
    I have always considered that there is also something disturbingly surreal in the imagery of the second stanza.
    I’m sorry if he was rude to the Irish but, then, he was rude to most people.

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      haha – yeah it’s not racist if you hate everyone, right? Actually it still probably is!

  • Avatar Ray says:

    Philip Larkin was born in Coventry not Hull as stated.

    • Emma Baldwin Emma Baldwin says:

      Thank you for your comment, Ray. You’re quite right, he was born in Coventry.

  • Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
    Scroll Up