Attack by Siegfried Sassoon

Attack by Siegfried Sassoon is a descriptive and confronting poem about the reality of war. Attack builds suspense and has an emotional impact on the reader most probably because Siegfried Sassoon participated in World War One himself. The poem builds up line after line and concludes with uncontrollable fear and anxiety, emotions that probably raged rampantly in the battlefield. Sassoon uses the poetic devices of Alliteration, Enjambment, Imagery, and a unique rhyming scheme to emphasize the negative emotions felt during war. Considering the poem was published in 1918 his words are quite different than the majority of poems related to war published at that time. Most poems glamorized war and made fighting seem like a heroic feat that all young men should desire. Sassoon puts a different spin on war by depicting its harsh reality.

This poem has been analysed separately by two members of the team. To read the other interpretation/analysis of this poem, please scroll to the bottom of the page and click ‘Next’ or Page 2.


Attack Analysis

Attack consists of 13 lines of poetry and can be read, in full, here. Sassoon has written his work in such a way that each line builds up upon the other and eventually climaxes at the end. The first two lines begin by describing the beauty of nature.

At dawn the ridge emerges massed and dun

In the wild purple of the glow’ring sun,

Sassoon describes the beautiful scenery of the mountains emerging in the early morning sun. Imagery is used here to describe a very peaceful and calming scenery. Sassoon does not continue this calm tone for long, as in the next line Sassoon quickly shifts his tone and begins to describe what the battlefield actually looks like.

Smouldering through spouts of drifting smoke that shroud

The menacing scarred slope; and, one by one,

Sassoon explains that the ridge illuminated by the sun is not really a calm scene for it is littered with areas of smoldering smoke, most probably from bombings. Not only is the battlefield full of smoke, but the land is also scarred and damaged with debris. As Sassoon continues on his poem, he uses enjambment to connect his thoughts together and each line is more drastic than the previous one.

Tanks creep and topple forward to the wire.

The barrage roars and lifts. Then, clumsily bowed

Sassoon describes the way in which tanks move forward slowly and prepared for launching its weaponry. There seems to be a personification of tanks as Sassoon does not state that it is the soldiers in the tanks that move the machines forward, but rather, he clearly states that it is the tanks creeping forward. This gives us a feeling of what sort of hardcore inhumane emotions in the battlefield. While in war, tanks must seem like monsters or large creatures with a mind of their own.

With bombs and guns and shovels and battle-gear,

Men jostle and climb to, meet the bristling fire.

In the next lines Sassoon uses his most vivid Imagery to describe what can be seen in the battlefield. Men with weapons running forward. What are the men running towards? Are they running towards victory with courage? No, in reality they are literally throwing themselves into a bristling fire. This is one way of saying that they are committing suicide. Sassoon sates that men are running with small weapons into a bristling fire. It almost seems like a joke, for what will bombs and guns do to save you against a fire? Sassoon makes it clear that the battlefield is not glorious, but rather, it is a hopeless place to be in.

Lines of grey, muttering faces, masked with fear,

They leave their trenches, going over the top,

Sassoon moves beyond the battle scene and begins describing the actual soldiers who are fighting in war. He describes their faces as grey, muttering and masked in fear. The color grey is a symbolism of death or lacking life. The soldiers are so scared and fearful that they are muttering without realizing it. This line truly creates a sense of horror, for by now Sassoon has created a vivid image of what it felt like on the battlefield. Sassoon states that the soldiers leave their trenches to join the war. He associates the trenches with the soldiers as if they are something that the soldier value which would make sense as they are the safe havens which protect the soldiers from the battlefield.

While time ticks blank and busy on their wrists,

And hope, with furtive eyes and grappling fists,

The last three lines of the poem describes the feeling of the soldiers. Sassoon transitioned through first describing the battlefield, to describing the soldiers and now concludes with describing the emotions of the soldiers. He states that time was blank and busy on their wrists. This obviously means that time had no meaning to the soldiers for there was no time limit to a battle, it could last a few hours or it could last days. What a horrific situation to be in. Sassoon describes that the soldiers still had hope. They were hopeful and they were desperately trying not to get caught. By now Sassoon has successfully succeeded in describing the desperation that the soldiers felt, his last line seals the horror of war.

Flounders in mud. O Jesus, make it stop!

The last line states that the soldiers were really in a pathetically hopeless situation. Flounders in mud. A flounder is a type of fish, so you can only imagine what the chances are of survival if a flounder finds itself stuck in mud. Sassoon is stating that going to war is like committing suicide. The last three words, make it stop show how these overtly strong soldiers are left with nothing at the end by crying and begging for the torture to stop. The title of the poem is Attack, this could be sue to the nature of the poem itself. Sassoon builds up suspense throughout the poem and ends with a torturous ending, much like an attack. Otherwise, the title attack could be referring to the feelings of the soldiers. War may be glorified and described as a noble duty, but in reality it feels and is essentially nothing more than an attack.

Attack by Siegfried Sassoon is a haunting poem which discusses the reality of war and what happens when a soldier is out on the battlefield. Sassoon transitions between describing the battlefield physically, to describing the soldiers physically and eventually conclude with the feeling’s of the soldiers.Sassoon builds suspense with every line and uses imagery, personification and enjambment to capture the reader’s attention and as accurately as possible describe the true horrors of being a soldier at war.


About Siegfried Sassoon

Siegfried Sassoon was a major poet during the time of World War One. He grew up in the lap of luxury in a wealthy Jewish family but chose to enlist in war himself. Sassoon fought on the Western front and wrote poetry about war. He has written many celebrated works, including the Sherston trilogy which is basically just a fictionalized version of his life. Sassoon was known for his bravery in war and was nicknamed ‘Mad Jack’ because of his unbelievable, almost reckless bravery during battle. Despite his active participation in war he was known for protesting the continuation of war, especially after he lost one of his best friends during battle. He died of stomach cancer at 81 years of age.

Click Next or Page 2 to see a different interpretation/analysis of this poem.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

What's your thoughts? Join the conversation by commenting
We make sure to reply to every comment submitted, so feel free to join the community and let us know by commenting below.

Get more Poetry Analysis like this in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get new poetry analysis updates straight to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

  • Avatar Ibrahim Nakasha` says:

    Flounder does mean fish but Sassoon actually refers to something else. Flounder can also mean to struggle or stagger clumsily in mud or water and that seems more relevant than the fish. It doesn’t really matter though, backing yourself or giving evidence at the end is what matters and you did back yourself. The way you interpreted even with the misunderstanding was great, and you made it relevant to war and its futility.

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Thank you – I think you are spot on with the definition of the word. Don’t you just love a good homophone?

  • Avatar Juliet says:

    I am to understand quite a number of different annotations. Which is actually good!

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Thank you for the feedback!

  • Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
    Scroll Up