London by William Blake

This poem, London, reveals the William Blake’s feelings toward the society that he lived in. To endure 1800s England was to know the most restrictive of societies, where laws were broken only on penalty of death, and people followed a specific societal protocol.

The poem London reveals William Blake’s true thoughts about the society in which he lived.

It is still universal and timeless, as every society has restrictions which it has placed on human lives. The speaker makes it very clear that he believes the government to have too much control and society to be too stringent. The poem, London, has been highlighted as one of the Top 10 Poems by William Blake, ranked by Poem Analysis.


London Analysis

Stanza 1

I wander thro’ each charter’d street,

Near where the charter’d Thames does flow.

And mark in every face I meet

Marks of weakness, marks of woe.

In the first stanza, the speaker provides setting and tone.  The setting can of course be derived from the title,  but the first stanza also reveals that the speaker is walking down a street.  He says that he “wander[s] down each chartered street”. The term “wander” gives some insight into the speaker as well.  He appears to be not quite sure of himself,  and a bit misguided, if not entirely lost. The use of the term “chartered” also suggests that the streets he walks are controlled and rigid. He is not walking in a free, open field, but a confined, rigid, mapped out area. The speaker will expound upon this idea later on in London . As he walks, he notices something about the faces of the people walking by.  There seems to be the marks of weariness in them all. He describes their faces as having “weakness” and “woe”. This sets up the tone as melancholy. The gloom and the sadness seem to seep from the speaker’s voice as he describes the passersby.


Stanza 2

In every cry of every Man,

In every Infants cry of fear,

In every voice: in every ban,

The mind-forg’d manacles I hear

While the first stanza sets up the tone of London, the second stanza gives some insight into the speaker’s melancholy feelings toward the people he watches pass him by. The speaker reveals that from the cry of the newborn infant, to the cry of the full grown man, he hears the “mind forg’d manacles”. This gives insight into his despairing view of mankind. The “manacles” are shackles or some kind of chain that keeps a person imprisoned. The fact that these chains are “mind forg’d” reveals that they are metaphorical chains created by the people’s own ideas. The use of the word “ban” reveals that these manacles are placed there by society. A ban, of course, is a restriction given by law. The speaker’s use of words such as “Charterd” “ban” and “manacles” reveal his belief that society metaphorically imprisons people.  Suddenly, it becomes apparent that the thoughts, pressures, and ideals of society are under scrutiny here.


Stanza 3

How the Chimney-sweepers cry

Every blackning Church appalls,

And the hapless Soldiers sigh

Runs in blood down Palace walls

In this stanza of London, the speaker digs even deeper into the reasons for his feelings toward humanity. He implies that the shackles worn by the people and inflicted by society have some disastrous results. He begins with the Chimney sweeper. The Chimney sweeper was one of the poorest of society. His life expectancy was threatened because of his line of work. He was consistently dirty and sick. Those of the lowest class were forced into this kind of work in order to provide for their families. Then, the speaker criticizes the church, calling it “blackening” and claiming that even the church “appalls” at the the Chimney sweeper. Often, the chimney sweepers were just children. They were small enough to fit down the chimneys. These children were often orphaned children, and the church was responsible for them. This explains why the poet ties the chimney sweepers with the “blackening church”.

The speaker then turns his attentions to the “hapless soldier”. He has already criticized society, pointed out the misfortunes of the poor and the hypocrisy of the church, and now he will also criticise the government by suggesting that the soldiers are the poor victims of a corrupt government. He reveals his feelings toward war by describing the blood that runs down the palace walls. The palace, of course, is where royalty would have lived. Thus, the speaker accuses the higher up people in his society of spilling the blood of the soldiers in order to keep their comfort of living in a palace.


Stanza 4

But most thro’ midnight streets I hear

How the youthful Harlots curse

Blasts the new-born Infants tear

And blights with plagues the Marriage hearse

In the final stanza, the speaker reveals how the corruptness of society attacks innocence. He says that he hears the “youthful Harlot’s curse…”. The idea of a youthful harlot suggests the level of poverty and corruption, that a girl who was yet a youth would be involved in prostitution. Then, things become even more interesting, as the speaker reveals the object of the Harlot’s cursing. She curses at the tears of a newborn baby. This is the ultimate attack upon innocence. The speaker does not reveal whether the harlot is the mother of the baby or not, but he does imply that rather than comforting a crying infant, she curses it. This reveals the hardened heart of the harlot, which represents the hardened heart of society at large. While the innocent shed tears, the perverted attack them.

The last line of London reveals the speaker’s thoughts on marriage as well. The Harlot, apparently, has “blighted” the “marriage hearse”. She has deranged marriage by having sold her body before ever entering into the marriage union. Although the speaker believes that the Harlot has somehow damaged marriage, he also reveals his beliefs about marriage in the first place. The fact that he calls it a “marriage hearse” reveals that he views marriage as death. Overall, the poem has criticized society, the church, prostitution, and even marriage. The innocent baby shedding tears represents those who are innocent in the world. They are few and they are scoffed at. They are also infants, and are not left to be innocent for long. Their innocence is “blasted”  by the cry of the perverted.  


William Blake Background

William Blake was born near London in the late 1700’s, which means that he lived in the 1800’s when the ideals of society were restrictive and often overwhelming. He did not conform to these patterns, but rather found himself among other radical thinkers.
Read William Blake's Biography

One biographer explains,

Blake was a nonconformist who associated with some of the leading radical thinkers of his day, such as Thomas Paine and Mary Wollstonecraft.

These people, like Blake, believed in free thinking and were not the kind to conform to society’s standards. This poem particularly condemns the stringent rules of society. Blake experienced some of this first hand. At one point in his life, he was accused of speaking against the king ( The penalty for this was severe, and Blake was distraught over the issue until he was finally acquitted. It is not surprising that he should revile such a strict government. The words of this poem condemn every kind of organized religion and government while it reveals the human heart’s longing for freedom.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

What's your thoughts? Join the conversation by commenting
We make sure to reply to every comment submitted, so feel free to join the community and let us know by commenting below.

Get more Poetry Analysis like this in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get new poetry analysis updates straight to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

  • Avatar Alisa says:

    When was this analysis published?

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      28 July 2016

  • Avatar SARA says:

    i really appreciate your hard work it helps me alot to understand

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Thank you. Often having something simplified is all you need to access a poem.

  • Avatar womanizer says:

    who are you?

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Who are any of us?

  • Avatar kizi1000 says:

    Thanks for your sharing

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      you’re welcome.

  • Avatar Ewan Mcgregor says:

    ‘Hello There’

    Ewan Mcgregor
    May 19th 2005

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Usually I would delete this as it is clearly spam, but I was meant to bring balance to the comments on this page, not leave them in tatters.

  • Avatar Will Blake says:


    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Is it me, you’re looking for?

  • Avatar pasha says:

    why are u evil

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      I don’t know but I have a feeling that the three sixes that I have tattooed on my head is a factor.

  • Avatar Chingadingding says:

    Ching ching ching Chong ching ching chiiiiii

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Isn’t that the lyrics to a Jason Derulo song?

  • Avatar PHilJohnson says:

    good poem could have better annotations, and ALOT less agression!

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      I’m not sure I agree, Blake is clearly trying to paint a picture with his words. I think this is a great example of using powerful metaphors to convey tone.

  • Avatar kurtis says:

    well done you keep it up Sophia.

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Thank you. I’m confident Sophia would be pleased by the praise.


    It is a poet not an author.
    Overall, good analysis.
    Thanks. 🙂

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      How true! Amended accordingly.

  • Avatar Ruth says:

    Good analysis though I’m intrigued as to why she thinks that Blake was necessarily against marriage. Isn’t it talking about the men who had perhaps been to the harlots before they married and were now just about to infect their poor wives? But maybe she knows that Blake did think negatively about the idea of marriage as he was a free thinker.

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Unfortunately the writer of this article is no longer with poem analysis. Perhaps she was assuming based on the content of the poem? Or maybe she had contextual information from elsewhere. It is impossible to say.

  • Avatar Sophia says:

    I’m from France where I study English civilisation and literature. All these notes and the whole website really helped me for my exam! Thank you so much!

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      What lovely feedback. I’m pleased it is helping!

  • Avatar georgia says:

    stop being horrible to lee I don’t think that it is aggressive
    many regards


    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Thank you for your support.

  • Avatar Joel says:

    Please do not be so aggresive when you speak I found it deeply saddening to see.

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Hi Joel. Thank you for your feedback, although I am slightly confused as to what you found to be aggressive?

  • Avatar joel says:

    Don’t be so aggressive, may I suggest anger management.

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      I think you already did. 😉

  • Avatar Cecily says:

    Please, correct the mistake in Allisa Corfman’s bio -About the author- part. “She haS always enjoyed writing…” instead of “have”! Thank you.

    • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

      Very well spotted! You must have the eyesight of an eagle! Unfortunately Alissa is no longer writing for us and I believe that only she can edit her bio. But please keep those eyes peeled for any errors. It helps us to improve!

  • Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
    Scroll Up