The Unknown Citizen by W.H. Auden

‘The Unknown Citizen‘ by W.H. Auden is a 32 line poem that utilizes a number of different rhyming patterns. The poem contains examples of both skillfully written rhyming couplets and seemingly patternless portions of verse that are variable in their end rhymes. 

It is impossible to escape the lighthearted nature with which intense subject matter is being tackled in the poem. In fact, the surprising rhyming couplets add to the humour that is pervasive in this piece. 


Summary of The Unknown Citizen 

The Unknown Citizen” by W.H. Auden describes, through the form of a dystopian report, the life of an unknown man. 

The poem begins with the speaker stating the fact that throughout his life there was never one “complaint” against the citizen. No one thought badly of him, in fact, he was more like a “saint” than anything else.  The next section of the poem tells of the man’s popularity. He was well liked by his friends, social enough to be normal, and dedicated to his work. The man served the “Community” for his entire life. The only lapse in his work for his company was when he went to serve in the “War,” and now, after he has died. 

The speaker also states that the man read the newspapers to a sufficient degree. He went to the hospital once, but left quickly, “cured,” as he should have been. The citizen consumed all the latest technologies, as a “Modern Man” should and owned the proper devices. 

In the final section of the poem the speaker concludes his report. He states that the man was “for” war when he was supposed to be, and for “peace,” when the government told him to be. The last lines prompt the questions a reader might have been wondering the whole time. Was this man happy? Was he free? These are things that speaker sees as “absurd.” He states that, of course the man was happy, the government would have “known” if he wasn’t. 


Analysis of The Unknown Citizen

Lines 1-5

Auden has chosen to craft a speaker for the “Unknown Citizen” who is completely concealed, but strangely familiar. He speaks with a candidness, and emotionless tenor which is hard to connect with. Once the identity of the speaker is a bit clearer though, one might come to recognize the faceless, seemingly lifeless person of a government worker or customer service representative. 

The speaker is going about his job, as he would any other day, and is not impacted by the facts he is relaying about the “unknown citizen.”  The speaker’s lack of inflection is made up for by the rhymes which are pervasive in his speech. 

It was Auden’s goal in this piece to present the words of a dystopian narrator, to the tune of a rhyme. This contrast is quite forceful as the reader will discover throughout the poem’s 32 lines.

The speaker begins by introducing the main subject of the poem, who will never receive a name, or proper identification. The reader will only come to know him through the facts that the “Bureau of Statistics, “the Greater Community,” and other fictional dystopian sounding organizations, have seen fit to share.

The first thing of note that the speaker mentions is that there are no “complaints” logged against this person. No one stepped forward, during their investigation, to say that he had done some wrong. All of the reports that this speaker has at his disposal tell him that the “unknown citizen” is a “saint.” His record is spotless and pristine. 

This poem certainly reads like a report and it is interesting to consider why these particular facts about this person’s life were chosen. What do these things really tell about someone? It is important to note that there is nothing deeper discussed in these lines. One cannot come to fully know the “unknown citizen” through this report, hence the irony between the title and the goal of the verses. 


Lines 6-14

In the second set of lines the report continues. Throughout the “unknown citizen’s” life, he did a number of things to serve the community. In fact, he spent his whole life “serv[ing] the Greater Community.” Capitalization is utilized throughout the poem to acknowledge bodies, or official groups that exist in the world of the poem. The citizen served the community up until the day he died. The only exception was when he went to fight in the “War.” Which war this is meant to be is not made clear. 

The citizen, 

…worked in a factory and never got fired, 

But satisfied his employers, Fudge Motors Inc. 

The man did as he was told, dedicated himself to his work, and was continually in the good graces of his employers. So far this person seems incredibly straightforward. There is not much more revealed besides surface level details that anyone could infer. 

The man did not have any “odd views” and he always paid his “union dues.” He was on time with payments and was not strange in anyway. That is to say, he did not believe in, or participate in anything, that went against the tenants of this dystopian feeling world. 

The man not only did good at work, he was also popular with his friends. The were social, and completely normal. One might at this point be suspicious of the total normalcy that filled this person’s life. Shouldn’t there be more there to see and learn about?


Lines 15-22

The poem continues and the speaker refers to a number of other organizations that have been keeping an eye on the citizen. The “Press,” presumably a government run news organization, reported to the speaker that the citizen, 

…bought a paper every day 

And that his reactions to advertisements were normal in every way. 

The man was as susceptible to advertising as he was supposed to be, and committed to the news of the day. Continuing in the theme of this dystopia, it is quite likely his life was consumed with the propaganda produced by these agencies. It is hard to know who this person truly was with these purely surface level details. 

Additionally, the man went to the hospital, but did not stay long. He left “cured” just as he should. He was sufficiently healthy, and sufficiently interested in acquiring all the appliances a “Modern Man “would need. He had, 

A phonograph, a radio, a car and a frigidaire.


Lines 23-32

In the final section of this piece the speaker concludes his report on the “unknown citizen.” The researchers at “Public Opinion,” perhaps the government organization the speaker works for as he uses, “Our,” conclude that the man had all the “proper opinions.” The propaganda was doing its job and the man believed what he was meant to. He was an advocate for what the government told him to be, whether the was “peace” or “war.” 

The man’s personal life consisted of a normal wife, and “five children” that were “added…to the population.” The number was not too many or too few, it was just “right” for a man of his “generation.” 

The final lines of the piece bring greater attention to the absurdity of the poem’s premise. The speaker, as if defending himself, states that the “question” of whether the citizen was “free” or “happy” is absurd. He was certainly happy, otherwise, “we should…have heard.” 

What's your thoughts? Join the conversation by commenting
We make sure to reply to every comment submitted, so feel free to join the community and let us know by commenting below.

Get more Poetry Analysis like this in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get new poetry analysis updates straight to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

  • Avatar Robert Gainer says:

    There is no reference to a government in the poem, only to the speaker aligning himself with institutions by using the possessive pronoun “our”. Thus the poem can be equally applied to societies that are liberal democracies as well as those that have a heavily centralised state control. This is a poem about the role of data intrusion into private life that facilitates social engineering and control. Written in England in 1939, it was prophetic, as Europe was being sucked into a war of competing totalitarian ideologies. It is equally relevant now, as we can see in scandals such as the data intrusion by Facebook and Cambridge Analytica. It is a humorous poem In its delivery,, but not in the least bit funny in its subject matter. Beware people!

    • Emma Baldwin Emma Baldwin says:

      Hi Robert,
      Thank you for your thoughtful comment. It is true that this piece draws one in with its humour and then surprises with its depth and relevance.

      • Avatar Sir Dicnballs says:

        Hi Emma,

        • Lee-James Bovey Lee-James Bovey says:

          I really don’t want to know how you discovered that!

  • Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
    Scroll Up
    Send this to a friend